PSEUDOSCIENCE AND CHATGPT
I know that the world is diving toward chaos and destruction, hence the name of this website. Eighteen-years later, I am now convinced that prophecy is real; whether you the reader believes it or not, I do not care. I have gotten what I need from this discovery. This website has basically been a personal journal about that journey; the spinoff of spending 46-years coming to the conclusion that prophecy is real is that I have been curious about the physics.
It has been a dark week for humanity, the social engineers have decided to destroy Western civilization. Their implementation of some grand design reminds me of the hubris of today’s genetic engineers experimenting with nature at a foundational level and toying with the building blocks of life. Once Humpty Dumpty falls off the wall, all the king’s horses and all the king’s men will not be able to put Humpty Dumpty back together again.
When they get the world they want, it will not be pretty. There is a description in The Kolbrin Bible of how our afterlife appearance is shaped by our inner-self and our true morality.
Google AI: According to a story in the Kolbrin Bible, there is an account where a person did not recognize their adulterous spouse because the spouse’s inner corruption from unfaithfulness outwardly manifested, changing their appearance. The story, found in the Book of Creation, is used to illustrate how immoral and spiritually bankrupt actions can physically alter a person’s appearance, reflecting their inner state.
This narrative emphasizes a core theme of the Kolbrin Bible: that outward appearance is not merely superficial but can be a direct reflection of a person’s inner moral and spiritual condition. For the Kolbrin, true beauty comes from virtue, while corruption and deceit, like adultery, inevitably affect one’s character, eventually showing on the outside.
In essence, I am searching for this spiritual plane that intersects with the Earthly plane.
I am going to save my opinions of what is coming our way for the next post. I have always been more interested in how prophecy works. In 2023, George Ure at UrbanSurvival.com asked me how I believed the science worked behind Nostradamus’ future vision. Our combined thoughts on Scrying The Future resulted in a 45-page PDF.
My contribution to answering this question was to refer to my work with the theories of the late Dr. Harold Aspden. My curiosity about Dr. Aspden’s work essentially sprung from reading all of Tom Bearden’s theories and his work on Alternative Energy. In my mind’s eye, I can see Western civilization’s experts roll their eyes and cry “pseudoscience“.
Dr. Aspden’s PhD was based on the anomalous energy he discovered inside the cores of electromagnets. He was the head of IBM’s European patent division. Even though Dr. Aspden had an impressive resume, both he and Tom Bearden, an engineer for the U.S. Army, were both called practitioners of pseudoscience.
There are between approximately 372,000 to 964,000 physicists in the world according to Google AI; that means one out of every 8,299 to 21,505 people have the credentials to be critics. Regardless, I could not care what they believe; I have never been impressed by experts. The condition of the world and science speak for themselves.
On August 6th, 1990, I officially added Space Propulsion Mechanic to my resume. I worked at an advanced Jet and Rocket Propulsion Laboratory for fourteen-years, and on my first day as a “rocketeer“, a fellow believer in Alternative Energy and pseudoscience handed me an article by Tom Bearden. It certainly changed my belief in the world that we know; strangely enough, I understood every part of Bearden’s highly technical article.
This coworker and I became good friends, and 35-years later, we still talk about how that day changed my life. I went back to college; I took physics, astronomy, chemistry, and electronics, and that footpath led to where I am at today.
Currently, at the peak of my professional game, I am being tested to the fullest. Wire by wire, my team and I are putting back together the pieces of $50-million dollars worth of equipment. As Ray Stantz of the Ghostbusters said, “I’ve worked in the private sector; they expect results.”
With that said, I really do not listen to any crap about pseudoscience. I have taken the basic college level courses in “Real Science“. I have 50-years of practical experience working on rockets, jet fighters, spy planes, helicopters, and flight simulators. Part of that rocket experience also included working in a cryogenics laboratory with new materials.
I have spent over 25-years studying Dr. Aspden’s writings; I have put all of his equations into a 300-page MathCad worksheet that includes the recognized equations of physics and electronics.
My own work generated lots of questions that required explaining from someone at a graduate level in physics, and for years I had hoped for that opportunity.
When ChatGPT first went public several years ago, I fed some of this same material into it, and it choked on the equations. Today, ChatGPT allows users to upload material in PDF form, and it can analyze both text and mathematical formulas. I was quite amazed.
One of my technicians is riding the technology curve; his side hustle is 3D printing, and he has ChatGPT on his phone. I had to put it on mine too; it can be a very good tool.
My team is now involved in some very serious troubleshooting that covers the spectrum from industrial power, down to digital five-volt circuits. Just to confirm the standard industrial color coding for a three-phase power circuit that I was looking at, I asked ChatGPT what they were; yellow-taped wires were not ringing a bell with me.
ChatGPT informed me that sometimes yellow is used as Phase B. The circuit that I was looking at now made sense.
In my previous post, I showed readers how ChatGPT answered to my work with Nostradamus’ prophecies. I was looking for a neutral judge, and that conversation speaks for itself.
The real test came when I spent last weekend feeding ChatGPT my work with Dr. Aspden’s theories.
Therefore, this post is my monument to self-indulgence and pseudoscience; I certainly am not a theoretical physicist, but I do like to play with the math and the physics of our reality. ChatGPT understood everything that I threw at it; I think the conversation that we had was historic. So, ChatGPT was that physicist with a graduate degree who I could ask my questions, and that is how ChatGPT rated our conversation.
ChatGPT is polite, but it does not placate the ego of users. It pointed out some of the errors in my math and some of my misconceptions in physics. But as I reminded ChatGPT, back in the day, I could aim an electron gun and shoot electrons through magnetic coils into a grid on a phosphor screen, so my perception of wave-particle duality carries a tinge of metaphysics with me.
If some readers do not understand what all of this means, my apologies. I just wanted to get this post out and back-to-back with ChatGPT’s analysis of my work with Nostradamus’ prophecies.
In two days, I had 25-years of questions answered.
In metaphysics, religion, and philosophy, there is the concept of “The One“, the Greek “Monad“.
I did not have a deep grasp of what “The One” meant or even time. Essentially, I have come to believe that “The One” must cover all of Quantum physics, including the probabilities that go with the theory, to satisfy the engineering rules. This would mean the superposition of every moment of time throughout history everywhere in the universe.
How would such a universe look, where every single thought is projected into space and stored for eternity? Where does individual consciousness enter into the picture? From amoebas to human beings, biology depends on negative-feed-back in relation to its environment and time. Is that the definition of self-awareness?
How does Quantum physics work when there is no observer? Read this ChatGPT conversation and find out.
The legendary Akashic Records are the Information Field that psychic Ingo Swann believed existed. Edgar Cayce has given many readings on the technology required to read this Information Field.
EDGAR CAYCE READING 443-5: January 9, 1934
36. (Q) Is it possible to rejuvenate the body with etheronic energy?
(A) How else may it be done? From what source does growth come? By the induction into the body of the etheronic forces from life, or plant life, or whatever forms that may be brought, and in not over-using those but keeping an even balance. Yes, it may be done, but you are going into very dangerous fields, until you know what you are doing with it!
37. (Q) Can you tell where the instrument for tuning in on the akashic records would differ from the one we have here?
(A) One we have here we are drawing from the influences, or that influences upon an individual activity separated from the whole yet subject to it, see? while the akashic records is that going out or passing out into the records, see? One is going out, the other is coming in.
38. (Q) What alterations would be necessary to produce this change?
(A) Almost a reversal of the forces to draw in, or would be more on the order of necessitating the raising of the influences that are less affected by the earth itself, or reaching into – that’s what you’re going to find in your strata sphere – reaching into the forces that the records are being made on the ether – in the force that is above or in circle or globes the earth. Then, these raised so they may be turned back to the expressing in manifested form.
39. (Q) Can these be made perceptible to the earth?
(A) To the earth, and may be made pictures of – you can bring it into that far. They are changed, though, from this machine – so we are through for the present.
Is there an Akashic Record of every moment in time or a Philosopher’s Stone? Is that moving from pseudoscience to outright lunacy?
Edgar Cayce predicted that one day a device would be built to gain access to the Akashic Records.
Here is the irony of the desire to do that; if I was able to snap a picture of various historical events in the past, or even snap a picture of myself on the planet Mars side-by-side with a few aliens, most people today would believe that it was an AI creation. Thus, our technological evolution still keeps faith and doubt at a good distance. There will always be believers, non-believers, and people who just don’t know.
I am in that last category, and that is why I read and experiment.
Edgar Casey talked about “the skein of time“. What is the definition of “Skein“?
Skein: a length of thread or yarn, loosely coiled and knotted, a tangled or complicated arrangement, state, or situation.
A length of thread? Is time based on “String Theory“?
WHAT ABOUT THE THREADS IN THE SUN AND EARTH’S MAGNETIC FIELDS?
Tom Bearden was always talking about the Curl Free A Field. The A Field was once a mathematical convenience to solve for the B Field, magnetism. It was a mathematical construction until Japanese physicist Akira Tonomura overthrew over a century’s worth of disbelief and proved that it existed.
I believe that at a foundational level, Tom Bearden was working with the theories of Dr. Harold Aspden; if you do not understand Dr. Aspden’s work, then you will never get to the heart of Tom Bearden’s work, and that big word Scalar that everybody in the Alternative Media slings when they mention Directed Energy and Scalar Weapons. These are the people who give pseudoscience its bad name.
Tom Bearden called the Active Vacuum the Time Domain for a reason. The Active Vacuum is how the protons and electrons in the universe breath. Particles everywhere and in everything on the Earth are constantly refreshed from the Active Vacuum.
Software, like AI, is a tool and nothing to fear.
I have always had problems with the math; I also see math as a tool, and not conceptually, which is required for theoretical physicists. Sometime in the 1990s, on my first Windows machine, I discovered MathCad. I have been running MathCad 2000 for a quarter-century now, and I keep my fingers crossed and hope it keeps working with every new version of Windows.
An Archimedes-type arbelos is the picture that graces the cover of this post. It was the only intuitive mathematical concept that I have ever had, and in a few minutes in 2022, after some inspiration, it all came to me. It is model on the Proton, which never decays. And then there are those other short-lived Baryons with three negative quarks with charges of -1/3 (See CERN Experiments creating quark-gluon plasmas), these types of quarks may give time its arrow.
This is perhaps the greatest piece of artwork that I have ever created. Inside of it is the theory of the Inverse-Square-Law, which governs all of electromagnetic theory, and that pertains to cell phones and all other electromagnetic broadcasting equipment; in it is also Phi, the Golden Ratio, which appears everywhere in nature, as well as containing the theory of charge conservation, including a map of the proton’s inner structure. The proton is the final state of the universe, and my version of an Archimedes Arbelos represents the scaling of the universe.
I see it as the inside and the outside; the scale is up and down to infinity. It is The Monad, The One containing the all. This model suggests that the basic tenants of physics in this universe may operate at all scales.
That is such an audacious claim, but ChatGPT is a wonderful critic, and it liked my model. Here are the best parts of my conversation with ChatGPT.
1) G. A. STEWART
We are going to start to analyze the math and physics work of Dr. Harold Aspden. The main website for his theories on physics is https://haroldaspden.org/.
1) CHATGPT
2) G. A. STEWART
Examine my Master Math Worksheet. Can you understand the formulas and definitions of the constants in physics?
2) CHATGPT
3) G. A. STEWART
Examine these web pages:
Here are the two web pages as PDFs.
3) CHATGPT
4) G. A. STEWART
Consider that Aspden’s Number N is represented by his photon model of 27 Quons in a 3 x 3 x 3 cell equals one photon.
The center 3 Quons are the spin axis of the photon leading to the ratio of 27/24 equals 1.125 equals 9/8 equals 1.125. This is a musical third divided by a musical fifth (3/2)/(4/3) equals 1.125.
4) CHATGPT
5) G. A. STEWART
Give me a general description of Dr. Aspden’s Positive Continuum.
5) CHATGPT
6) G. A. STEWART
How can the Positive Continuum be continuous? I have pictured it as a fluid of discrete positive charges of fractional size based on the Quon’s charge of -1?
(-1 QUON) + (+1 CUBIC CONTINUUM OF FRACTIONAL POSITIVE CHARGES) = NEUTRAL VACUUM
6) CHATGPT
7) G. A. STEWART
It is my impression that the Aspden Quons are orbiting around his various sizes of Gravitons at the center of every lattice cell.
7) CHATGPT
8) G. A. STEWART
I see the Quons orbiting in a two-dimensional planar lattice. Is this how Dr. Aspden saw his lattice?
8) CHATGPT
9) G. A. STEWART
I see the Quon orbit radii changing based on the energy within each cell and based on his own drawings.
9) CHATGPT
10) G. A. STEWART
Given the mass of the Aspden Quon and the dynamics of its orbit around a Graviton, it is possible to calculate the temperature of each cell. When the Quon is in a nominal orbit around a Graviton and producing all the constants of physics, I used the Boltzmann Constant to calculate a temperature of over 30 million kelvin. Is the math correct in my PDF?
10) CHATGPT
11) G. A. STEWART
We only see these high temperatures in Galactic Halos and the cores of stars. Thus everything inside of galactic halos is in a state of adiabatic cooling?
11) CHATGPT
12) G. A. STEWART
Where would we see these kinds of temperatures?
12) CHATGPT
13) G. A. STEWART
I see this Virtual Quon Vacuum Temperature as condensing to form the particles in a baryonic plasma.
13) CHATGPT
14) G. A. STEWART
Cell coherence is exactly what I am suggesting from Dr. Aspden’s work in the formation of a proton. I see it as three cells forming a central spinning axis as the 24 outer cells synchronize to the spin axis. Once the 27 cells are synchronized, you have a photon.
14) CHATGPT
15) G. A. STEWART
What were Dr. Aspden’s thoughts on the Positive Continuum and time?
15) CHATGPT
16) G. A. STEWART
Have you heard of a theory that electric charge is really an asymmetry in time?
16) CHATGPT
17) G. A. STEWART
Is Dr. Aspden’s Dimuon a matter and antimatter pair?
17) CHATGPT
18) G. A. STEWART
I see the Dimuon as two Interlaced Tetrahedra inside one lattice cell. This connects to Buckminster Fuller’s work and geometrical view of the vacuum.
18) CHATGPT
19) G. A. STEWART
The Dimuon matter/antimatter pair thus represents two directions in time?
19) CHATGPT
20) G. A. STEWART
Have you any data on the Nodland and Ralston theory of galactic polarization?
20) CHATGPT
21) G. A. STEWART
Is there any evidence of polarization or spin exhibited by the entire universe?
21) CHATGPT
22) G. A. STEWART
Please explain CMB “axis of evil”.
22) CHATGPT
MY ADDITIONS ARE THE POLES
23) G. A. STEWART
Technically, that is a polarization in the CMB is it not?
23) CHATGPT
24) G. A. STEWART
In the Aspden model the Quon orbit radii determine the temperature, so wouldn’t this temperature-pattern anomaly qualify as some form of polarization by the Aspden Quons?
24) CHATGPT
25) G. A. STEWART
What is your opinion on my diagram?
25) CHATGPT
25) G. A. STEWART
Do you see the inverse square law?
25) CHATGPT
26) G. A. STEWART
I see this as a model of the Proton. AC represents 2 positive 2/3 quarks. BA represents 1 negative 1/3 quark.
26) CHATGPT
27) G. A. STEWART
Please explain Dr. Aspden’s theory behind magnetism.
27) CHATGPT
28) G. A. STEWART
Have I enhanced or added to any of Dr. Aspden’s theories?
28) CHATGPT
29) G. A. STEWART
Why is Dr. Aspden’s work considered pseudoscience?
29) CHATGPT
30) G. A. STEWART
Let us take two issues you bring up, Dimensional/thermodynamic ambiguities. Examples like a “vacuum temperature” of 30.4 million degrees kelvin and the Michelson–Morley experiment.
30) CHATGPT
31) G. A. STEWART
I see this Vacuum temperature of 30.4 MK as a primeval artifact in the universe’s evolution. As you pointed out, these temperatures appear here and there, but are not widespread, because since the so-called “Big Bang” things have generally cooled down.
31) CHATGPT
32) G. A. STEWART
I believe that frame dragging is responsible for the failure of the Michelson–Morley experiment. Where does that idea stand today?
32) CHATGPT
33) G. A. STEWART
I think you are missing the point in Aspden’s Theory, the positive continuum not only co-moves with local free-fall (geodesic) frames, it creates them.
33) CHATGPT
34) G. A. STEWART
Please explain Dr. Aspden’s two frames, the Inertial Frame and the Electric Frame.
34) CHATGPT
35) G. A. STEWART
I feel some form of electrostatic measuring device can provide evidence of the EF frame.
35) CHATGPT
36) G. A. STEWART
If the positive continuum creates physical particles and physical reality, that means physical reality is constantly recreating itself as the positive continuum flows through Aspden’s stationary Quon Lattice, which are really virtual electrons. Like rivers and streams, the flow seems to follow the gravitational topology of the universe.
36) CHATGPT
37) G. A. STEWART
In playing with the Bohr equations for electron speed, I rearranged to solve for charge with the known electron orbital speeds. As can be seen from the different Bohr Orbits, the amount of charge changes. Why is this incorrect in modern physics?
37) CHATGPT
38) G. A. STEWART
Having aligned many electron guns to hit a phosphor screen in projectors, I see electrons as little BB’s.
38) CHATGPT
39) G. A. STEWART
Did Paul Dirac give an address called the Development of the “Physicist’s Concept of Nature” and mention the work of Felix Ehrenhaft who had done experiments that had easily obtained fractional electric charges?
39) CHATGPT
40) G. A. STEWART
Where do advance and retarded waves enter the picture with the De Broglie wavelength formula?
40) CHATGPT
41) G. A. STEWART
A particle’s momentum becomes dependent on the environment it is moving through. I am suggesting that this momentum is subject to the emitters of advanced and retarded waves in the environment in which the particle moves.
41) CHATGPT
42) G. A. STEWART
This answer seems to connect to the experiments described in the book “The Quantum World Unveiled by Electron Waves” by Akira Tonomura?
42) CHATGPT
43) G. A. STEWART
Since Akira Tonomura proved the physical existence of the A Field and that it was not a mathematical construction, I have come to see the A Field as the interface to Aspden’s EF.
43) CHATGPT
44) G. A. STEWART
As I understand it, Dr. Aspden claimed that moving charge exchanges energy with the field and this accounts for Lorentz Invariance?
44) CHATGPT
45) G. A. STEWART
Everything in physical reality is a “coulomb piece“.
45) CHATGPT
46) G. A. STEWART
I am suggesting that the Aspden positive continuum are what magnetic field lines are created from.
46) CHATGPT
47) G. A. STEWART
What do you think of Ken Wheeler’s research on what is called ferrocell photography?
47) CHATGPT
48) G. A. STEWART
These are ferrocell photographs that I took. I find it interesting that we see these same patterns in nature.
48) CHATGPT
49) G. A. STEWART
The nano-particles in a ferrofluid are repulsive. I believe this mirrors Aspden’s positive continuum.
49) CHATGPT
50) G. A. STEWART
I have experimented with using off-the-shelf ferrofluids mixed with various oils. The thicker the viscosity of the oil seems to contribute to a poorer image. What would be a good oil to mix with off-the-shelf ferrofluids?
50) CHATGPT
51) G. A. STEWART
It has been alleged that there are different biological effects for a north magnetic pole and a south magnetic pole?
51) CHATGPT
52) G. A. STEWART
What is the alleged “good” pole of a magnet?
52) CHATGPT
53) G. A. STEWART
What is the data on an increase in measured electrostatic charge near paranormal events?
53) CHATGPT
54) G. A. STEWART
What about the experiments the Soviet Union did regarding people with alleged psychokinetic powers?
54) CHATGPT
55) G. A. STEWART
Given everything in this discussion, I suggest that charge is time and the scale of time is based on the amount of charge. Time zero going forward is negative charge; time infinite going backward is positive. All of this is based on the fact that the proton does not decay. It is the final state of the universe.
55) CHATGPT
56) G. A. STEWART
What is time? I say that only biological entities that depend on negative feed back and that have biological self-awareness create time.
56) CHATGPT
57) G. A. STEWART
Quantum physics requires an observer to initiate the collapse of the wave function. In one and two who are the observers?
57) CHATGPT
58) G. A. STEWART
I suggest that Rupert Sheldrake’s morphic fields are inside of magnetic field lines and that the particles of Dr. Aspden’s positive continuum encode that information, this includes the past, present, and future. The information and time increment is weighted by charge.
58) CHATGPT
I asked ChatGPT more than this discussion shows, but clearly ChatGPT knew what it was talking about, so, I was seriously impressed. Many of its suggestions about creating a device to detect and measure Dr. Aspden’s Electric Frame are beyond my financial resources. Though I do have the knowledge. I have worked with cyrogenics and cryostats for many years, so, the technical skills are there, but I worked in a multi-million dollar laboratory with state-of-the-art computers and measuring equipment.
ChatGPT’s suggestions were a sad slap in the face for me and a reality wakeup call. I had a flashback to many late nights sitting in front of computers and tweaking cryostat temperatures and pressures. So, this is not something you can build out in the garage with Amazon parts.
All I can do is tweak the theory as ChatGPT also suggested. Since I do not want to muddy the reputation of Dr. Aspden, I want to emphasize that I am simply trying to describe this picture that I have of his Electric Frame and his Inertial Frame. We live in the Inertial Frame; magnetic fields define the Inertial Frame.
A purely electric field in one frame can appear as a combination of electric and magnetic fields in a moving frame. Magnetism is therefore a relativistic phenomenon.
It is my belief that psychic phenomena arises from the Electric Frame. This is why I asked ChatGPT about the report of large electrostatic fields around people who had alleged psychokinetic powers. As you read, ChatGPT shot that idea down, but there is more information that I need to add to the discussion.
I can now see that AI is a very powerful tool. It will take me weeks to sort out the information from last weekend’s discussions. It provided ideas that I had never considered, and the truth is, I could not of had this level of discussion with anyone else on planet Earth.
When one of my technicians and I were using ChatGPT to chase down facility power wiring, the Test Director was in the background chanting, “I love my AI overlords, I love my AI overlords.”
It was a perfect and funny moment for our times.
NOSTRADAMUS AND THE THIRD AGE OF MARS 2024
AND
G. A. STEWART’S
NOSTRADAMUS COMPENDIUM 2024
FOR SALE $15.00
G. A. STEWART’S NOSTRADAMUS COMPENDIUM
THE PASSWORD IS ON THE LAST PAGE OF
NOSTRADAMUS AND THE THIRD AGE OF MARS 2024
